
Navigating Payer Reviews and Medical Decision-Making: A Critical Guide for Urgent Care
Phyllis Dobberstein, CPC, CPMA, CPCO, CEMC, CCC Urgent care operators face increasing challenges from payer reviews—a situation exacerbated by ongoing confusion around coding guidelines and proper documentation of medical decision-making (MDM). As more urgent care providers grapple with administrative burdens and financial pressures, understanding how to document and code accurately has never been more important. The Rise of Payer Reviews Pre-payment reviews have become commonplace, initiated when a provider’s billing patterns—such as a higher frequency of level 4 visits compared to peers—trigger payer scrutiny. Practices might receive notification letters identifying …
Read More
Read More

Effective Strategies Minimize Claim Denials in Urgent Care
Urgent care centers serve a crucial function in providing prompt and accessible healthcare, but they encounter unique challenges in managing their revenue cycle, particularly in reducing claim denials. Unlike primary care or specialized medical practices, urgent care clinics often treat patients on a one-time basis, making both patient intake and billing more complex. Additionally, frequent turnover among front desk staff contributes to recurring errors in patient registration, insurance verification, and claims processing, all of which raise the likelihood of denials. Denied claims can delay reimbursements, increase administrative burdens, and negatively …
Read More
Read More

Refresher: Guidelines for E/M Coding
Phyllis Dobberstein, CPC, CPMA, CPCO, CEMC, CCC Hard to believe that the new evaluation and management (E/M) guidelines have been in place for urgent care for 4 years. These guidelines created by the American Medical Association (AMA) were a complete shift from what was previously published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Instead of bullet points, levels are determined by the work involved in treating a patient. E/M codes can be leveled by either medical decision making (MDM) or time. Here is a summary of the guidelines to …
Read More
Read More

What’s New in Telemedicine for 2025?
Phyllis Dobberstein, CPC, CPMA, CPCO, CEMC, CCC The American Medical Association (AMA) added a Telemedicine Services category to the Evaluation and Management (E/M) section of the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code set. Codes are divided up by the technology used and the patient type (ie, new vs. established). These codes are for synchronous, real-time interactive encounters between the provider and the patient. Codes are leveled by medical decision making (MDM) or time, which is similar to the office visit codes. CPTTechnologyPatient TypeMDMTime Minimum98000Audio-videoNewStraightforward15 minutes98001Audio-videoNewLow30 minutes98002Audio-videoNewModerate45 minutes98003Audio-videoNewHigh60 minutes98004Audio-videoEstablishedStraightforward10 minutes98005Audio-videoEstablishedLow20 minutes98006Audio-videoEstablishedModerate30 minutes98007Audio-videoEstablishedHigh40 …
Read More
Read More

How ‘Data Reviewed’ Works When Coding E/M
Phyllis Dobberstein, CPC, CPMA, CPCO, CEMC, CCC Three elements determine the level for evaluation and management coding (E/M). “Amount and/or Complexity of Data to be Reviewed and Analyzed” is 1 of them and also the most confusing. Data Reviewed remained a point system after guidelines changed in 2021. As an auditor, I see both undercoding and overcoding in E/M caused by not applying the rules correctly. Let’s start with what tests count toward Data Reviewed. Lab tests—whether performed in-house or sent out to a laboratory—always count toward Data Reviewed. Labs …
Read More
Read More