Richard A. Schoor, MD, FACS, Private Practitioner, Smithtown, NY
Introduction
Epididymitis is among
the most frequently
diagnosed and treated
conditions in men.
Typically, men present
to, and are diagnosed and
treated by, their primary
care physicians or their urologist.
Treatment is with
antibiotics on an outpatient
basis. Epididymitis is, in
general, non-life threatening
and non-urgent. However,
afflicted patients experience
significant distress
from the symptoms and
tend to seek treatment early.
Urgent care medicine is
emerging as a distinct specialty,
separate from both
emergency medicine and primary care. From a patient’s
perspective, an urgent care office visit would be an
attractive alternative to an emergency room visit for a
variety of reasons, especially if the patient perceives his
symptoms to be non-life threatening, but is concerned
nonetheless to the point of wanting immediate medical
attention without long waits and other unpleasantries
associated with an emergency
department visit.
Epididymitis, for the
most part, fits this description
well and has become
commonplace in urgent
care centers. Therefore, it is
imperative that urgent care
physicians understand the
epidemiology, etiology,
evaluation, and therapy of
epididymitis.
Etiology and Epidemiology
Sperm is produced in the
testicle and matures in the
epididymis, a long convoluted
tube that sits adjacent
to the testicle. From
the epididymes, the sperm
is transported via the vas
deferens to the ejaculatory duct, in the prostatic urethra.
It is at this location that infected urethral urine
may access the male reproductive tract, ascend to the
epididymis, and cause epididymitis. Sterile urine can
also reflux up these ducts and cause a reactive, chemical
epididymitis.
Epididymitis connotes inflammation of the epididymis, an accessory gland in the male reproductive
tract. Classically, the inflammatory process is the result
of bacterial infection, but it can be caused by viruses or
reflux of sterile urine up the reproductive tract.
In men less than 35-years-old, Chlamydia is the
likely agent, thus making epididymitis in this group a
sexually transmitted disease.1,2 In men greater than 35-
years-old, E coli is the most commonly isolated
pathogen.3
Hematogenous spread of bacteria is rare, but can
occur with tuberculosis. True bacterial epididymitis in
older men or children is typically associated with an
anatomic abnormality, such as bladder outlet obstruction
or a congenital urologic anomaly, such as an
ectopic ureter.
Viral infection (e.g., mumps) may also cause epididymitis.
Mumps epididymal orchitis is more common
in the post-pubertal, pediatric population but has
become uncommon due to the routine use of the
mumps vaccine.
Fungal infections may also cause epididymitis, most
notably in the immunocompromised.4-6 Other causes
of epididymitis include medications (amiodarone),
vasculitis ulititis (Henoch-Schönlein purpura), and
parasites.7-9
Epididymitis affects one in 350 U.S. men annually
and has no race predilection.10
Diagnosis
History and Physical Examination
Men with epididymitis present with scrotal or testicular
pain that can range from a mild, achy discomfort
to severe pain with associated high fever and a leukocytosis.
Men with the latter will most commonly
present to an emergency department due to the severity
of their symptoms and will occasionally require
admission for intravenous antibiotics.
In an ambulatory setting, men more commonly
present with milder complaints of testicular or scrotal
pain. Occasionally, they will have dysuria or urinary
frequency suggestive of a urinary tract infection (UTI),
though often voiding symptoms will be absent.
A comprehensive medical history should be performed
and specifically include a urologic history.
The physician needs to inquire about any history of
urinary tract surgery or instrumentation, voiding
complaints, prior infections, and prior episodes of
scrotal pain in the patient.
Finally, a sexual history, including prior sexually transmitted
diseases, should be elicited and needs to include
the patient’s use of safe sex practices, or lack thereof.
A physical examination of the scrotum, testicles,
and epididymis is to be done and will likely demonstrate
tenderness over the involved epididymis. In
severe cases, fluctulance is present. Occasionally, epididymitis
will cause a reactive hydrocele to form and
when large enough, the hydrocele will impair physical
examination and prevent accurate diagnosis.
In this case, a scrotal sonogram is indicated. It is
important to exam the testicles, as well, and to determine
whether or not the acute scrotal pain is caused
by testicular torsion or tumors, the two most serious
diagnoses in the differential. The involved testicle in
men with torsion will be very tender and have an
abnormal transverse lie within the scrotum and the
ipsilateral cremaster reflex will be absent, in general.
When testis torsion is suspected, the patient should
be sent to an emergency department for immediate
urologic consultation and, if need be, surgical detorsion.
Adjunctive Tests
Readily available adjunctive tests, when added to a
comprehensive history and physical, can suggest or
rule out the more serious conditions in the differential
diagnosis. The urine analysis should be the first
adjunctive test performed, and in severe cases of epididymitis
will show pyuria. While the presence of
pyuria suggests the diagnosis of epididymitis, it is
not diagnostic and its absence does not rule out the
diagnosis since patients can have fairly severe cases of
epididymitis without urinary findings.
A urine culture should be performed, as well. The
clean-catch method is the preferred technique, especially
in the uncircumcised male, in whom preputial
microbes can contaminate a urine specimen. The
clean-catch technique involves instructing the man to
retract his foreskin (if present) and clean the glans
penis with an aseptic towelette, and then void midstream
into the sterile collection cup. This technique
should be used routinely in the urgent care setting and
provides accurate urine culture results in men with
minimal specimen contamination risk.
Alternatively, the three-glass cycle collection technique
is optimal (Figure 1).11 In the three-glass cycle,
the patient is asked to clean as above, and then to
void the first 10 cc of urine into cup A, and the rest
into cup B. The third specimen is collected into a sterile
cup after the physician performs a prostate examination.
This method can enable the physician to localize
the source of the infection to the urethra (glass A),
the bladder, (glass B), or
the prostate (glass C).
While the three-glass cycle
is optimal, it is somewhat
cumbersome to perform
and is not routinely used
nor mandatory in the
urgent care setting.
A relatively new urine
test that can detect Neisseria
gonorrhea (GC) and
Chlamydia in the urine via
DNA amplification, the BD
ProbeTec™ (Quest Diagnostics),
is also available. It
uses polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) technology
to detect GC and chlamydial
DNA fragments in the
urine of patients with suspected
STDs.12-14
Other highly sensitive
and specific PCR-based
tests are also available.
Men are simply asked to
void into a sterile collection
cup, and the urine is
transferred to the preservative-containing transport
tube with a pipette. No urethral swab is needed. Since
epididymitis in young men is considered an STD and
most commonly caused by chlamydial infection, the
DNA urine probe has become a useful adjunct in the
diagnosis and treatment of epididymitis.
Scrotal Sonogram
Perhaps the single most important adjunctive test is
the scrotal sonogram.15-17 The scrotal sonogram is
abundantly available, safe, painless to perform, and
inexpensive and provides the most accurate diagnostic
information relating to scrotal pathology. Sonograms
will readily detect testicular tumors, even small,
non-palpable ones, can visualize the testicle within a
hydrocele, and has echo-features that are characteristic
for epididymitis and orchitis. Most sonogram units
today, even portable office-based units, have Doppler
flow capabilities and are useful in ruling out the presence
of testicular torsion.
However, if testicular torsion is even suspected, it is
prudent for the evaluating physician to obtain a
prompt urology consult or to send the patient immediately
to the emergency
room at a hospital that is
equipped to handle this
type of emergency.
Sonographically, epididymitis
has findings that
are suggestive, though not
diagnostic, of the condition.
These findings include
hyperemia of the epididymes
and surrounding
testicle or epididymal engorgement.
Often, a reactive
hydrocele is present
and can be seen on the
sonogram. However, the
most important sonographic
findings are the absence
of a testis mass and the
presence of testicular blood
flow on Doppler.16-17
Cautionary Notes
The clinician should bear
the following cautions in
mind at all times:
The presence of Doppler
flow in the testicle does not completely rule
out testis torsion. In cases of suspected torsion,
urologic consultation is mandatory.
Epididymitis is uncommon in prepubertal boys.
Acute scrotal pain in this population should be
considered torsion until proven otherwise.
Bacterial epididymitis in the pediatric population
represents a urinary tract infection and needs
to be evaluated appropriately.
Therapy
The treatment of epididymitis depends on a variety of
factors that include the age of the patient, the severity
of the presentation, and the patient’s medical history.
In young adults or in patients at risk for an STD, ceftriaxone
sodium and doxycycline are the preferred
agents due to their efficacy against Neisseria gonorrhea
and Chlamydia. Ceftriaxone is given as a one-time
dose, but doxycycline must be given for seven to 14
days, which can adversely affect compliance.
Alternatively, the treating physician may prescribe
azithromycin, which is advantageous over ceftriaxone
sodium and doxycycline with regard to both its antimicrobial spectrum of activity and for patient
compliance.
Affected men should be counseled regarding the
sexual transmissibility of the disease and their partners
should be evaluated. In addition, it is prudent for
the treating physician to discuss safe sex practices
and barrier protection with the patient and to document
the discussion in the medical record. Resumption
of unprotected sexual intercourse with untreated
partners is a vehicle for reinfection.
In older men, among whom E coli from either cystitis
or a bacterial prostatitis source is the most common
uropathogen, treatment with a fluoroquinolone
antibiotic is preferred. The fluoroquinolone class of
antibiotics is optimal due to the pharmacological
properties of these agents, which allow them to penetrate
the male reproductive tract, specifically the
prostate, in high bacteriocidal levels.
The quinolones are also effective in the presence of
bacterial pseudomembranes and even biofilms. Other
antibiotic classes, such as the penicillins, lack these
important pharmaco-qualities and their usage, while
acceptable, is associated with higher treatment failure
rates and disease recurrence rates. The duration of
therapy can range from 14 days to six weeks, depending
upon the underlying etiology of the epididymitis,
its severity, and its responsiveness to treatment. For
example, in men whose epididymitis was caused by an
underlying bacterial prostatitis, an extended four-tosix-
week treatment period is indicated.18-22
In the pediatric population, epididymitis is considered
a UTI and is treated as appropriate. In general,
a course of an antibiotic such as sulfamethoxazole/
trimethoprim, nitrofurantoin, or amoxicillin can be
given with a patient referral to a urologist or pediatric
urologist. Quinolones are contraindicated for use in
children in the United States due to perceived issues
relating to cartilage growth. In addition, doxycycline
can cause permanent teeth staining and must not be
used in the pediatric population.
See Figure 2 for an algorithm regarding optimal
evaluation and management of acute scrotal pain
and epididymitis in the urgent care setting.

Follow-up
Patients with acute epididymitis do well and the condition
typically resolves without sequelae when treated
appropriately. Young men with the STD variant of
epididymitis can expect rapid improvement in their
symptoms in a matter of one to two days, though this
rapid improvement occasionally results in treatment
non-compliance and recurrences. Rarely, men with
inadequately treated epididymitis can develop infertility
due to epididymal obstruction as a late complication.
This process is analogous to pelvic inflammatory
disease in women.
Patients should be seen back in the office in two
weeks, at which time compliance is assessed and follow-
up cultures are performed. After this, patients
can be seen on a PRN basis.
Pediatric patients with epididymitis should be
referred to a urologist or, if available, a pediatric urologist
for follow-up.
Older men with the E coli-induced epididymitis,
likewise, do very well after antimicrobial therapy.
Patients should be followed up in two to three weeks
to see if their pain has resolved. In addition, patients
are instructed to call sooner if their symptoms do
not improve or get worse.
Some cases of epididymitis are associated with reactive
hydroceles, as previously mentioned; the hydroceles
often take several weeks to months to resolve, if they
resolve at all. Men with large persistent reactive hydroceles
can be referred to a urologist for counseling and, if
the hydrocele causes the man bother, surgical correction.
Lastly, some men develop a persistent nonspecific
scrotal or epididymal pain after an episode of epididymitis.
The etiology of this pain is unclear, but
infection with standard uropathogens is unlikely.
Men who complain of this type of complication are
best referred to a urologist for evaluation and management
that can include trials of NSAIDs, low-dose tricyclic
antidepressants, and alpha-blocker therapy,
among others.
Summary
Epididymitis is common and affects all ages without
race predilection. Affected patients will have scrotal
pain of varying severity and associated findings. After
a thorough history and physical exam, adjunctive
tests such as the UA and the scrotal sonogram may aid
in the diagnosis. In young men, epididymitis is generally
caused by GC or Chlamydia and is thus an STD. In
older men, epididymitis is typically caused by E coli and
is thus a UTI. Boys with epididymitis are also viewed as
having UTIs and are to be managed as such.
When treated appropriately, epididymitis resolves
without sequelae in the majority of men.
References
1. Berger RE, Alexander ER, Harnisch JP, et al. Etiology, manifestations, and therapy of
acute epididymitis: prospective study of 50 cases. J Urol. 1979;121:750-754.
2. Hoosen AA, O'Farrell N, van den Ende J. Microbiology of acute epididymitis in developing
communities. Genitourin Med. 1993;69:361-363.
3. Allen FJ, de Kock ML. Genito-urinary tuberculosis - experience with 52 urology inpatients.
A Afr Med J. 1993;83:903-907.
4. Docimo SG, Rukstalis DB, Rukstalis MR, et al. Candida epididymitis: newly recognized
opportunistic epididymal infection. Urology. 1993;41:280-282.
5. Hood SV, Bell D, McVey R, et al. Prostatitis and epididymo-orchitis due to Aspergillus
fumigatus in a patient with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:229-231.
6. Sohail MR, Andrews PE, Blair JE. Coccidioidomycosis of the male genital tract.
J Urol. 2005;173:1978-1982.
7. Choong CS, Liew KL, Liu PN, et al. Acute scrotum in Henoch-Schonlein purpura.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 2000;63:577-580.
8. Gabal-Shehab LL, Monga M. Recurrent bilateral amiodarone induced epididymitis.
J Urol. 1999;161:921.
9. Alves LS, Assis BP, Rezende MM. Schistosomal epididymitis. Int Braz J Urol. 2004;30:413-
415.
10. Luzzi GA, O'Brian TS. Acute epididymitis. BJU International. 2001;87:747-755.
11. Nickel JC, Shoskes D, Wang Y, et al. How does the pre-massage and post-massage 2-
glass test compare to the Meares-Stamey 4-glass test in men with chronic
prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome? J Urol. 2006;176:119-124.
12. Noguchi Y, Kanyama A, Fujita M, et al. [Evaluation of the new nucleic acid amplification
system for direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae
in women.] Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2006;80:251-256.
13. Koenig MG, Kosha SL, Doty BL, et al. Direct comparison of the BD ProbeTec ET system
with in-house LightCycler PCR assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria
gonorrhoeae from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5751-5756.
14. Gaydos CA, Theodore M, Dalesio N, et al. Comparison of three nucleic acid amplification
tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens. J Clin Microbiol.
2004;42:3041-3045.
15. Connolly SS, D'Arcy FT, Gough N, et al. Carefully selected intratesticular lesions can be
safely managed with serial ultrasonography. BJU Int. 2006;98:1005-1007.
16. Akin EA, Khati NJ, Hill MC. Ultrasound of the scrotum. Ultrasound Q. 2004;20:181-200.
17. Lerner RM, Mevorach RA, Hulbert WC, et al. Color Doppler US in the evaluation of acute
scrotal disease. Radiology. 1990;176:355-358.
18. Takahashi N, Ishihara K, Kimizuka R, et al. The effects of tetracycline, minocycline, doxycycline
and ofloxacin on Prevotella intermedia biofilm. Oral Microbiol Immunol.
2006;21:366-371.
19. Murillo O, Domenech A, Garcia A, et al. Efficacy of high doses of levofloxacin in experimental
foreign-body infection by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:4011-4017. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
20.Saito I, Suzuki A, Saiko Y, et al. Acute nongonococcal epididymitis - pharmacological
and therapeutic aspects of levofloxacin. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1992;38:623-628.
21. Blondin C, Costa P, Bressolle F, et al. [Diffusion of norfloxacin in epididymal tissue]
Pathol Biol. 1991;39:520-523.
22. Melekos MD, Asbach HW. Epididymitis: aspects concerning etiology and treatment. J
Urol. 1987;138:83-86.